[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-20: Transfer Policy SlowStart and Simplified Needs Verification

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 23 20:32:51 EDT 2014


On Sep 23, 2014 4:18 PM, "Steven Ryerse" <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>
wrote:
>
> I have my ipv6 but only one of my upstreams supports it so I can’t run
BGP.  That’s real life at the moment.  Until then I still need ipv4 like
everyone else.
>
>

Which bgp speaking upstream does not support ipv6?

Is it a regional network? You choose them because of price ?

CB
>
> Steven Ryerse
>
> President
>
> 100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
>
> 770.656.1460 - Cell
>
> 770.399.9099- Office
>
>
>
> ℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
>
>         Conquering Complex Networks℠
>
>
>
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:08 PM
> To: Steven Ryerse
> Cc: David Huberman; Matthew Petach; arin-ppml at arin.net List (
arin-ppml at arin.net)
>
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-20: Transfer Policy
SlowStart and Simplified Needs Verification
>
>
>
> Yep… Everyone should deploy IPv6… I’m all for that.
>
>
>
> Owen
>
>
>
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 7:31 PM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
>> What a breath of fresh perspective!  This is what is going on in the
real world and much of it outside of ARIN - and I can’t even get consensus
of removing needs tests in ARIN-2014-18 on a measly /24.  As if somehow the
ipv4 depletion problem can be saved by limiting allocations of /24s.  The
world is changing rapidly and its time to embrace the future as it will be
very soon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Steven Ryerse
>>
>> President
>>
>> 100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
>>
>> www.eclipse-networks.com
>>
>> 770.656.1460 - Cell
>>
>> 770.399.9099- Office
>>
>>
>>
>> <image001.jpg>℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
>>
>>         Conquering Complex Networks℠
>>
>>
>>
>> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of David Huberman
>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:02 PM
>> To: Matthew Petach
>> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net List (arin-ppml at arin.net)
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-20: Transfer Policy
SlowStart and Simplified Needs Verification
>>
>>
>>
>> ​Hiya Matthew,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.  I want to respond to one item in your post:
>>
>>
>>
>> > I suspect the challenge here is that not everyone
>> > is in agreement about what constitutes a
>>
>> > "bona fide" transfer, as opposed to a land
>> > grab.  If we look at land allocations in california
>> > as any indication, humans will warp and twist
>> > any well-intentioned plan for their own greed
>> > and profits.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you talk to brokers and look at publicly-available
>>
>> data, it shows that the telcos and cablecos and large
>>
>> content providers have already scooped up (or are
>>
>> in the process of scooping up) the space they need
>>
>> for the forseeable future (presumably enough to
>>
>> tie them over until dual-stacking is sufficient).
>>
>>
>>
>> Amazon has been transferring blocks of a million
>>
>> IPs into their name from Merck for a few years now,
>>
>> according to transfer stats and Whois.
>>
>>
>>
>> Google has secured an exclusive option for more than
>>
>> a /8 worth of space already.
>>
>>
>>
>> Large blocks have disappeared off the market in China
>>
>> faster than you can lookup the Chinese welcoming phrase
>>
>> for "Hi".  [If anyone has an in on non-fraudulent space in
>>
>> China for sale, please hit me up!]
>>
>>
>>
>> From my point of view - and the point of view of my
>>
>> executives - this isn't a land grab.  It's for-profit
>>
>> corporations doing what's necessary to survive the
>>
>> current landscape while, as one PPML poster eloquently
>>
>> put it, fulfilling their fiduciary duty to their shareholders
>>
>> to ensure continuity of operations.  It makes business sense
>>
>> to these companies to buy or tie-up this space.
>>
>>
>>
>> And my point is not so much to argue about whether these
>>
>> are morally right or not, but to say that the big guys are already
>>
>> engaged in the market fully.  ARIN policy needs, in my opinion,
>>
>> to look out for everyone else to ensure equitability.  It isn't fair,
>>
>> in my world view, if Google can buy space willy-nilly without
>>
>> consequence, but Matthew and Dave's Tire Shop can't buy a
>>
>> /22 for their 1,000 devices which need front-end space without
>>
>> going through multiple rounds of transfers and purchases and
>>
>> what-have-you under ARIN policy.
>>
>>
>>
>> Just my opinion,
>>
>> David
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140923/f62be5e5/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list