[arin-ppml] *Spam?* Re: Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

Jay Moran (AOL) jay-ARIN at tp.org
Sun Jan 2 12:24:58 EST 2011


On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:

> On 12/30/10 12:04 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> > So no, I'm not interested in helping them make this bad idea more
> > palatable to the masses. It is a bad idea. I've pointed out why it is a
> > bad idea. As I've pointed out it is an *especially* bad idea if applied
> > to transfers... but I don't want them to take transfers out of the
> > proposal either, because doing so will make it *more likely* that it
> > will pass.
>
> Matthew has nicely summed my objections to 125.
>
> I support ipv6 deployment,I do not support 125.
>
> Joel
>

Have to say that I agree with Joel's agreement with Matthew's summation. I
too support IPv6 deployment, but do NOT support 125.

Jay
--
Jay Moran
http://tp.org/jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110102/fd001d6e/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list