[arin-ppml] *Spam?* Re: Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack

[Vaughn Thurman - Swift Systems]

And I weigh in with an echo.  I support IPv6 deployment, but do NOT support 125.  

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 2, 2011, at 12:24 PM, "Jay Moran (AOL)" <jay-ARIN at tp.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:
> On 12/30/10 12:04 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> 
> > So no, I'm not interested in helping them make this bad idea more
> > palatable to the masses. It is a bad idea. I've pointed out why it is a
> > bad idea. As I've pointed out it is an *especially* bad idea if applied
> > to transfers... but I don't want them to take transfers out of the
> > proposal either, because doing so will make it *more likely* that it
> > will pass.
> 
> Matthew has nicely summed my objections to 125.
> 
> I support ipv6 deployment,I do not support 125.
> 
> Joel
> 
> Have to say that I agree with Joel's agreement with Matthew's summation. I too support IPv6 deployment, but do NOT support 125.
> 
> Jay
> --
> Jay Moran
> http://tp.org/jay
>  
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110102/e078ad83/attachment.htm>