[arin-ppml] *Spam?* Re: Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
joelja at bogus.com
Sun Jan 2 11:00:32 EST 2011
On 12/30/10 12:04 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> So no, I'm not interested in helping them make this bad idea more
> palatable to the masses. It is a bad idea. I've pointed out why it is a
> bad idea. As I've pointed out it is an *especially* bad idea if applied
> to transfers... but I don't want them to take transfers out of the
> proposal either, because doing so will make it *more likely* that it
> will pass.
Matthew has nicely summed my objections to 125.
I support ipv6 deployment,I do not support 125.
More information about the ARIN-PPML