[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks
arin-ppml at westbrook.com
Tue Feb 15 15:58:03 EST 2011
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:18, Benson Schliesser <bensons at queuefull.net>wrote:
> It would not be appropriate for me to speak more specifically on their
> behalf. I, too, would like to see legacy holders communicate their
> perspective here. But given the legal perspective that some of them have
> toward ARIN, I unfortunately doubt they will participate in this community.
> (And I would be glad for somebody to prove me wrong on this point.)
That would be me, then, I guess. I have a single legacy /24 without LRSA,
and I've piped up in here once or twice before. Happy to oblige.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 13:12, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> wrote:
> For one, there isn't any specific complaint coming from legacy holders,
> just speculation that they would be impacted. (If a legacy holder came
> forward and found grounds for a policy to remove their listing, that's
> another matter.)
Indeed, I cannot forsee ever making such a complaint. If this proposal
intends to solve problems for legacy holders like me, it would seem void, as
I also see no real problem to even solve.
For example, I (can only) believe they had to submit to being in WhoIs from
> the start.
Quite so. I don't recall it being a formal requirement, but it was
definitely taken as understood.
Happy to follow up further if desired.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML