[arin-ppml] 2009.10.22 ARIN 24 day 2 part 2 notes

[Matthew Petach]

Thanks for the corrections--it's harder to jot down the text being
read from the remote participants, because the person reading
it doesn't have to pause to think, the way everyone else in the
room has to--which tends to overrun my internal buffer, leading
to more dropped bits in the notes.  ^_^;

Maybe I should put these on a twiki so they can be edited
directly afterwards.  :)

Thanks again!

Matt



On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at chl.com> wrote:

> Thanks Matt!
>
> Matthew Petach wrote:
>
>
>
>> Draft policy 2009-8: equitable IPv4 run-out
>> June 8th, 2009, draft policy 2009 aug 31
>>
>> similar policies in all regions.
>>
>
>
>
>
>  Ted Middlestat--in favour of policy, though he doesn't
>> think policy will help; orgs who are smart will move
>> to IPv6.  The stupid ones will be gaming the system
>> anyhow, and generating bogus needs.  Orgs that need a /17
>> will generate requests for /15s instead.  The Friday
>> night party will be all the procrastinators who haven't
>> prepared, and will be out of business 6 months later.
>> So, this is harmless anyhow.
>>
>
>
>
>  Joe Maimon supports the policy; if one or a few big
>> players clear out the final supply, we can end up with
>> a prime time sound bite.  ARIN should aim to prevent
>> gaming.
>>
>
> (2:26:17 PM) jmaimon: Joe Maimon - CHL, Pronouncable in many equally
> correct ways, but usually as Maymin or Mymin with equal stress on each half.
>
> I support this policy. I think that a scenario described where all scarce
> resources are cleaned out by one or a few big players could be the final
> black eye for the rir system in the eyes of many. It may even create a prime
> time news sound bite. I do not believe this policy is the be all end all,
> but I do not believe that policies should address potential gaming, ARIN
> staff is responsible as always for detecting and preventing gaming.
>
>
>
>  Policies reviewed
>> identify invalid whois POC 2008-7
>>  not fully implemented, some issues to bring to community
>>  and get feedback
>>
>
>
>  Ted; if you don't support sending email to the downstream,
>> raise policy to change NRPM.
>>
>> Joe Maimon, if you don't agree with this, emergency policy
>> action may be needed.
>>
>
> (3:50:41 PM) jmaimon: Yes, but if ARIN is going to delay implementation,
> then emergency policy action to excise reassignments is actually more
> apropriate
>
>
> I made this comment to address Chris concern that a complete review occur
> before run out, I suggested that instead of waiting policy cycle without
> implementation, this could qualify for the BoT to take more prompt action.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20091023/4546d869/attachment.htm>