[arin-ppml] Alternative to arbitrary transfers

[Martin Hannigan]

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>
>>> I don't think this is necessarily the case, especially as it
>>> pertains to legacy IP's, where they are not renting the car,
>>> but someone gave them the care to use for as long as they
>>> wanted free of charge.
>>>
>>>
>> By definition, legacy holders never requested IP addresses on
>> the basis of need.
>>
>
> As a legacy holder, I can tell you that is simply not true. Most, if not
> all
> legacy requests were based on need. The amount given
> relative to need has changed, and, the definition of qualified need
> has evolved over time, but, for as long as I can remember (which
> goes back a fair distance, but, not quite to 8 bit addressing and
> the days prior to IP) requests were based on need.



Have you signed the LRSA?

Best,

Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090408/726323a5/attachment.htm>