[arin-ppml] Alternative to arbitrary transfers

[Martin Hannigan]

In fairness to Owen. I aksed this because I am trying to figure out
where the different groups fall in terms of transfer. I see LRSA, RSA,
and legacy groups and I see mostly small block holders, indifferent,
and likely to participate in a market paired.

Anyone want to offer a self-correlation, public or private?

Best,

Marty



On 4/8/09, Martin Hannigan <martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>>> I don't think this is necessarily the case, especially as it
>>>> pertains to legacy IP's, where they are not renting the car,
>>>> but someone gave them the care to use for as long as they
>>>> wanted free of charge.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> By definition, legacy holders never requested IP addresses on
>>> the basis of need.
>>>
>>
>> As a legacy holder, I can tell you that is simply not true. Most, if not
>> all
>> legacy requests were based on need. The amount given
>> relative to need has changed, and, the definition of qualified need
>> has evolved over time, but, for as long as I can remember (which
>> goes back a fair distance, but, not quite to 8 bit addressing and
>> the days prior to IP) requests were based on need.
>
>
>
> Have you signed the LRSA?
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>