[Iana-transition] lanic update, ideas for new oversight board (MONC)
Richard Hill
rhill at hill-a.ch
Thu Oct 30 05:31:40 EDT 2014
IETF is not, at present, an incorporated entity.
Best,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi, 30. octobre 2014 10:25
To: Richard Hill
Cc: Andrew Dul; iana-transition
Subject: Re: [Iana-transition] lanic update, ideas for new oversight board (MONC)
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:
Seun,
Re footnote [1], there is at present an MoU between ITU and the NRO, see
http://archive.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-29oct04.htm
I presume that you are not suggesting that this MoU be abrogated,
I am definitely not suggesting that......
rather you are suggesting that nothing more is needed.
I am rather suggesting that the MOU be reviewed in a manner that allows the numbers community have ultimate decision when there is need to exercise it. The area that especially needs review includes the GPDP (item 5).
If that is correct, then I don't agree. As already indicated, I think that more is needed. But I do agree that it could be done by the NRO (but that would imply that NRO would have to be incorproated as a legal entity).
Well the council proposed also has to be incorporated and that is why i indicated that the NRO-EC formation/composition may need to change. However i don't think all these will be necessarily if there is a single incorporated entity that empowers the relevant communities (names, numbers, and protocol) and i just think the IETF may be in the best position for this.[1]
Regards
1. I have been saying this for some time and yet to hear any opposition to this.
Best,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
Sent: mercredi, 29. octobre 2014 20:56
To: Richard Hill
Cc: Andrew Dul; iana-transition
Subject: Re: [Iana-transition] lanic update, ideas for new oversight board (MONC)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:
NTIA awards the IANA contract, that is, it decides who performs the IANA function, and how.
Presumably the MONC would do that (for the IP address part of the IANA function) instead of NTIA.
Thanks for echoing that fact. We then need to determine whether its worth forming a council that will only be awarding a periodic contract. IMO if this community decide that a contracting regime is what is desired[1] then that role can be given to the NRO while the composition of NRO-EC is reviewed.
But you are right to ask for a more detailed explanation: the devil is in the details.
;)
Cheers!
1. Which i don't necessarily think is necessary
Best Richard
On October 29, 2014 6:30:17 PM CET, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe it's helpful to know what oversight activities is performed by NTIA at it relates to numbers(if any). That would perhaps help understand the scope of work of the MONC. Then the other question of what will the role of NRO look like and what's the formation of the MONC going to look like.
Cheers!
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 29 Oct 2014 16:40, "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
Hello
I am currently at the LACNIC meeting and we just had the discussion of ideas & proposals surrounding the IANA transition. A new set of ideas has been presented here for discussion in this region. The idea of a new oversight board (MONC) to perform the NTIA oversight function.
I bring it up here so that you can be aware of it and so that we can discuss the idea in our region as well.
Below are links to the slides and agenda which are in spanish.
A few personal notes from the presentation and the discussion.
Proposal for a Multistakeholder Oversight Numbers Council (MONC)
Permanent body that would support the NRO, would meet once per year to supervise the development & oversight of IANA functions, similar to the sitting fiscal committee of lacnic.
It was suggested that oversight role should be done by this body for the numbers portion of the IANA functions. Members of the Council would have to be selected or appointed to fulfill this role. How that would happen is not part of this initial idea draft.
One thing that was noted here is that this is a new idea and that it should be given time for discussion to see if it has merits. There aren't a lot of details on the structure here at this time, but they should come with time.
Andrew
http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/eventos/lacnic22-agenda-detallada
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/content_link/HBIR5OaMLUQIPZlmgHtCeLpQG4WO9cUjB83vUDPqMtNPuhGbNSNlJ2aVvUpiNdQM?dl=1
_______________________________________________
Iana-transition mailing list
Iana-transition at arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
----------------------------------------------------------------------Iana-transition mailing listIana-transition at arin.nethttp://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/iana-transition/attachments/20141030/2634b34d/attachment.html>
More information about the Iana-transition
mailing list