[Iana-transition] lanic update, ideas for new oversight board (MONC)

Thu Oct 30 05:24:55 EDT 2014

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:

>  Seun,
>
> Re footnote [1], there is at present an MoU between ITU and the NRO, see
>
>   http://archive.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-29oct04.htm
>
> I presume that you are not suggesting that this MoU be abrogated,
>

I am definitely not suggesting that......

> rather you are suggesting that nothing more is needed.
>

I am rather suggesting that the MOU be reviewed in a manner that allows the
numbers community have ultimate decision when there is need to exercise it.
The area that especially needs review includes the GPDP (item 5).

>
> If that is correct, then I don't agree.  As already indicated, I think
> that more is needed.  But I do agree that it could be done by the NRO (but
> that would imply that NRO would have to be incorproated as a legal entity).
>

Well the council proposed also has to be incorporated and that is why i
indicated that the NRO-EC formation/composition may need to change. However
i don't think all these will be necessarily if there is a single
incorporated entity that empowers the relevant communities (names, numbers,
and protocol) and i just think the IETF may be in the best position for
this.[1]

Regards
1. I have been saying this for some time and yet to hear any opposition to
this.

>
> Best,
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* mercredi, 29. octobre 2014 20:56
> *To:* Richard Hill
> *Cc:* Andrew Dul; iana-transition
> *Subject:* Re: [Iana-transition] lanic update, ideas for new oversight
> board (MONC)
>
>  On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:
>
>> NTIA awards the IANA contract, that is, it decides who performs the IANA
>> function, and how.
>>
>> Presumably the MONC would do that (for the IP address part of the IANA
>> function) instead of NTIA.
>>
>
> Thanks for echoing that fact. We then need to determine whether its worth
> forming a council that will only be awarding a periodic contract. IMO if
> this community decide that a contracting regime is what is desired[1] then
> that role can be given to the NRO while the composition of NRO-EC is
> reviewed.
>
>>
>> But you are right to ask for a more detailed explanation: the devil is in
>> the details.
>>
>
> ;)
>
> Cheers!
> 1. Which i don't necessarily think is necessary
>
>>
>> Best Richard
>>
>>
>> On October 29, 2014 6:30:17 PM CET, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe it's helpful to know what oversight activities is performed by
>>> NTIA at it relates to numbers(if any). That would perhaps help understand
>>> the scope of work of the MONC. Then the other question of what will the
>>> role of NRO look like and what's the formation of the MONC going to look
>>> like.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> sent from Google nexus 4
>>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>> On 29 Oct 2014 16:40, "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I am currently at the LACNIC meeting and we just had the discussion of
>>>> ideas & proposals surrounding the IANA transition.  A new set of ideas has
>>>> been presented here for discussion in this region.  The idea of a new
>>>> oversight board (MONC) to perform the NTIA oversight function.
>>>>
>>>> I bring it up here so that you can be aware of it and so that we can
>>>> discuss the idea in our region as well.
>>>>
>>>> Below are links to the slides and agenda which are in spanish.
>>>>
>>>> A few personal notes from the presentation and the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Proposal for a Multistakeholder Oversight Numbers Council (MONC)
>>>>
>>>> Permanent body that would support the NRO, would meet once per year to
>>>> supervise the development & oversight of IANA functions, similar to the
>>>> sitting fiscal committee of lacnic.
>>>>
>>>> It was suggested that oversight role should be done by this body for
>>>> the numbers portion of the IANA functions.  Members of the Council would
>>>> have to be selected or appointed to fulfill this role.  How that would
>>>> happen is not part of this initial idea draft.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that was noted here is that this is a new idea and that it
>>>> should be given time for discussion to see if it has merits.  There aren't
>>>> a lot of details on the structure here at this time, but they should come
>>>> with time.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/eventos/lacnic22-agenda-detallada
>>>>
>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/content_link/
>>>> HBIR5OaMLUQIPZlmgHtCeLpQG4WO9cUjB83vUDPqMtNPuhGbNSNlJ2aVvUpiNdQM?dl=1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Iana-transition mailing list
>>>> Iana-transition at arin.net
>>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Iana-transition mailing list
>>> Iana-transition at arin.net
>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng>Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/iana-transition/attachments/20141030/f80bea59/attachment.html>