[Iana-transition] NRO Proposal for consolidation of RIR regional inputs into single ICG response

[Jason Schiller]

Travis,

You mentioned "proposing that NGO's CRISP be amended to include the
following obligations and restrictions on appointees. "

Would it be acceptable to you to constrain the discussion to the ARIN
selection process, and not proscribe requirements on the other 4 RIRs?

__Jason

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Travis Biehn <tbiehn at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't enjoy the idea of having any member of an RIR appoint the two
> non-staff appointees. I'd like to see that as a hard rule.
>
> To be fully unambiguous, I am proposing that NGO's CRISP be amended to
> include the following obligations and restrictions on appointees.
>
> All appointees:
>
> Must lodge their interest publicly. [On relevant publicly Read and Write
> mailing lists.]
> Must identify themselves and demonstrate that they are physically and
> spiritually [demonstrate non-trivial ties] part of the RIR that serves them
> and they intend to represent.
> Must disclose all organizations, clubs and boards which they are members
> of. This is meant to include current and past employers for the past 5
> years.
> Must substantiate their qualifications and how they are able to dedicate
> the time and effort requisite of establishing a solution fitting the global
> communities best interest. [On an hour / day, week basis.]
>
> There is some verification of facts performed here.
>
> A dice is rolled, if the selected appointee overlaps in employment or
> membership (that is - a potential for the perception of cronyism is
> identified) in any way with an existing appointee they are disqualified. (A
> dice roll can here be substituted with some publicly verifiable source of
> random bits...)
>
> -Travis
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:38 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:21 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >> Is there a particular suggestion that you would propose?
>> >
>> > Let the AC do an internal nomination/election.  They
>> > are our reps.
>>
>> That's an option... I'd like to ask the ARIN AC (and the ASO
>> AC folks from the region, who have experience on multi-region
>> teleconferences) both for volunteers, and then let the AC
>> choose two.
>>
>> The two folks chosen will almost certainly have to be heavily
>> involved in the drafting of the ARIN region submission (i.e.
>> I _do_ expect that CRISP appointees to lead in assembly of
>> the views on this mailing list into the ARIN region input...
>>
>> Thoughts on the above?
>> /John
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub
> <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> |
> Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-transition mailing list
> Iana-transition at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-transition
>
>


-- 
_______________________________________________________
Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/iana-transition/attachments/20141016/f017609c/attachment.html>