[Iana-transition] NRO Proposal for consolidation of RIR regional inputs into single ICG response

Travis Biehn tbiehn at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 19:55:48 EDT 2014

I don't enjoy the idea of having any member of an RIR appoint the two
non-staff appointees. I'd like to see that as a hard rule.

To be fully unambiguous, I am proposing that NGO's CRISP be amended to
include the following obligations and restrictions on appointees.

All appointees:

Must lodge their interest publicly. [On relevant publicly Read and Write
mailing lists.]
Must identify themselves and demonstrate that they are physically and
spiritually [demonstrate non-trivial ties] part of the RIR that serves them
and they intend to represent.
Must disclose all organizations, clubs and boards which they are members
of. This is meant to include current and past employers for the past 5
Must substantiate their qualifications and how they are able to dedicate
the time and effort requisite of establishing a solution fitting the global
communities best interest. [On an hour / day, week basis.]

There is some verification of facts performed here.

A dice is rolled, if the selected appointee overlaps in employment or
membership (that is - a potential for the perception of cronyism is
identified) in any way with an existing appointee they are disqualified. (A
dice roll can here be substituted with some publicly verifiable source of
random bits...)


On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:38 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On Oct 16, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:21 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> > ...
> >> Is there a particular suggestion that you would propose?
> >
> > Let the AC do an internal nomination/election.  They
> > are our reps.
> That's an option... I'd like to ask the ARIN AC (and the ASO
> AC folks from the region, who have experience on multi-region
> teleconferences) both for volunteers, and then let the AC
> choose two.
> The two folks chosen will almost certainly have to be heavily
> involved in the drafting of the ARIN region submission (i.e.
> I _do_ expect that CRISP appointees to lead in assembly of
> the views on this mailing list into the ARIN region input...
> Thoughts on the above?
> /John

Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn>
| TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/iana-transition/attachments/20141016/1bbf80d6/attachment.html>

More information about the Iana-transition mailing list