2 questions
Darren Loher
dploher at level3.net
Thu Dec 21 14:06:40 EST 2000
I too would like the support for multiple POC's. Particularly
one for Abuse and one for Security.
-Darren Loher
Level 3 Communications
Global Data Architecture
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:02:24PM -0700, David R Huberman wrote:
>
> > 1. Right now a POC can have any number of phones and/or mailboxes. Is
> > this necessary? Can we delete all but one commercial phone, and all but
> > one primary mailbox? Do we need to keep fax number?
>
> * The fax number doesn't seem particularly relevant in most cases, no.
>
> * If you want to only allow one commercial phone number and one e-mail
> box, how about enhancing the database to allow multiple POC listings
> on objects, ala RPSL? That allows providers, for example, to list
> vanilla role accounts and list key techincal personal for, say, AS
> registrations.
>
> > 2. Right now both ASes and Networks have handles and names. Ideally, the
> > handle should be NET- or ASN- name. We would like to do some clean-up so
> > that all resources would be the same. Get rid of an ASNBLK- or NETBLK-,
> > as well as NETBLK-NET- and the like. Does anyone have a problem with ARIN
> > possible changing your AS or Net handle/name? Cathy Murphy will be
> > running a report to see how many people this will actually affect.
>
> * Are you talking about parent blocks only, or all registration objects?
> I certainly like the idea of streamlining the database objects of
> netname/handle for parent IP address objects and for AS registrations,
> but changing any portion of downstream assignments has the potential
> of creating havoc with many providers' SWIP scripts. Please clarify
>
> /david
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/dbwg/attachments/20001221/f102afaa/attachment.sig>
More information about the Dbwg
mailing list