[arin-ppml] Revised and Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for Future Allocations

[Brian Jones]

Mike,
IMHO Allowing for rent-seeking behavior increases the cost to those who are actually building and operating networks, therefore further limiting the availability of Internet number resources available for those with less funds to purchase them.

—
Brian


> On Mar 11, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> This policy removes the circuit requirement but retains the requirement that blocks be used on operating networks.
> This policy only affects transferred (read “purchased”) addresses and I don’t see  how it affects fair and impartial distribution, can you elucidate the manner in which fair and impartial distributions are affected by removing the circuit requirement?
> 
> I don’t think the proposal would have been approved for discussion if it opposed fair and impartial distribution.

The original proposal had wording to include the stipulation that Internet numbers were to be used by those building and operating networks.

> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20220311/a6398f6b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20220311/a6398f6b/attachment.sig>