[arin-ppml] Revised and Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for Future Allocations

[Fernando Frediani]

I am opposed to this proposal.
In fact it sound like a debauchery to try to permit leased addresses to 
be a valid reasons for justifying any type of allocation.

It is not in ARIN interest to facilitate something that not only is 
essentially against the fundamental of IP usage and justification but 
only would favor a tiny niche of business from what a tiny fraction of 
ARIN community benefits - the brokers.
I totally agree that in practice what is proposed removes functions from 
ARIN without any credible compliance mechanism to assure resources are 
being used as they have always intended to be.

Another thing from this proposal is that it started with subject "Remove 
Circuit Requirement" which is a too simplistic description of what it 
intends to do which was later adjusted to show all community what really is.

If there is no circuit in place there is no Internet access being 
provided and as such there is not justification to keep addresses if 
they are not used for providing Internet access. Addresses are not and 
can never be justified to be used to simply be leased to a third parties 
that are perfectly able to be RIR members and justify the need directly 
without any intermediaries.

Regards
Fernando

Em 10/03/2022 19:46, William Herrin escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:24 PM ARIN<info at arin.net>  wrote:
>> * ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for Future Allocations
> I continue to OPPOSE this proposal because:
>
> A) It asks ARIN to facilitate blatant and unapologetic rent-seeking
> behavior with changes to public policy.
>
> B) It proposes that third parties perform precisely and only the
> functions that ARIN itself performs without any credible compliance
> mechanism to assure the third party performs to ARIN's standards or in
> accordance with the community's established number policy.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20220311/12bf6425/attachment.htm>