<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I am opposed to this proposal.<br>
In fact it sound like a <span class="VIiyi" lang="en"><span
class="JLqJ4b ChMk0b" data-language-for-alternatives="en"
data-language-to-translate-into="pt" data-phrase-index="0"
data-number-of-phrases="1"><span>debauchery</span></span></span>
to try to permit leased addresses to be a valid reasons for
justifying any type of allocation.</p>
<p>It is not in ARIN interest to facilitate something that not only
is essentially against the fundamental of IP usage and
justification but only would favor a tiny niche of business from
what a tiny fraction of ARIN community benefits - the brokers.<br>
I totally agree that in practice what is proposed removes
functions from ARIN without any credible compliance mechanism to
assure resources are being used as they have always intended to
be.</p>
<p>Another thing from this proposal is that it started with subject
"Remove Circuit Requirement" which is a too simplistic description
of what it intends to do which was later adjusted to show all
community what really is.</p>
<p>If there is no circuit in place there is no Internet access being
provided and as such there is not justification to keep addresses
if they are not used for providing Internet access. Addresses are
not and can never be justified to be used to simply be leased to a
third parties that are perfectly able to be RIR members and
justify the need directly without any intermediaries.</p>
<p>Regards<br>
Fernando<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Em 10/03/2022 19:46, William Herrin
escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP-guGUWHQhhph3kPPB-QP0ySk=c4xaoxYXc9QaLWGA8zu+C1A@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:24 PM ARIN <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@arin.net"><info@arin.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">* ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for Future Allocations
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
I continue to OPPOSE this proposal because:
A) It asks ARIN to facilitate blatant and unapologetic rent-seeking
behavior with changes to public policy.
B) It proposes that third parties perform precisely and only the
functions that ARIN itself performs without any credible compliance
mechanism to assure the third party performs to ARIN's standards or in
accordance with the community's established number policy.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>