[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2021-1: ASN Clarifications to Sections 2, 8 and 10

[Martin Hannigan]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:06 PM Joe Provo <ppml at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:40:19PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> [snip]
> > It is. However, the text in Section 10 has to be agreed by all five RIR's
> > which means it goes off to global policy land. Just thinking out of the
> > box. Normally, I would agree, but changing section 10 for editorial
> changes
> > is a problem regardless.
>
> Then IMO we should incorporate into the developing style guide
> "don't touch section 10".
>

ACK +1


> > > The AC shepherds have the pen, so they certainly can sever the trivial
> > > change to section 10 if it is truly believed to trigger the End Times.
> > >
> > I could be wrong. If it goes forward and I am, beer is on me. But you'll
> be
> > waiting at least two years in theory. Which is still a waste of time for
> > such a change IMHO. However, if it does go forward, count on me to start
> > the when is a change a change discussion.
>
> Point is, the shepherds could trim the section 10 bit and move it
> along if non-substantive changes to section 10 is really a problem.
>
>
SGTM.


-- 
> Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
> Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20210415/426ed701/attachment.htm>