[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers

[Job Snijders]

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 21:25 Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> I am in complete agreement here. Let us not construct a policy in support
> of IP policy forum shopping.
>


Nobody has articulated why that would be a bad thing. Do you have any
supporting data to facilitate developing an opinion one way or another?

>

If we want to consolidate all the RIRs into RIPE because they have the most
> liberal policies and lowest fees, then let’s be honest about it and do it
> directly through proposals to consolidate the other RIRs. Otherwise, let’s
> recognize the inevitable consequence of this proposal regardless of
> advocate’s intents (which I mostly take at face value).
>


You seem to blow up the scope of the proposal to impossible width. It isn’t
about money or policies; the IPv6 transfer policy proposal originates from
 operational concerns related to the global availability of ARIN’s RPKI
services.

Kind regards,

Job

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20190405/54a282b5/attachment.htm>