[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Martin Hannigan]

Someone want to remind us all of what the "benefits" of SWIP are?

Best,

-M<


On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 22:12 Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:

> On 5/31/17 10:23 AM, hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
> >
> > As to my IPv6 proposal regarding SWIP, based on the comments received so
> > far, except for one person who totally rejected my Draft because
> > changing the IPv4 standard for SWIP to more than 16 addresses from the
> > current 8 addresses, everyone else responding supports changing the
> > current point from a /64, or SWIP for everyone, to some level that small
> > customers do not have to be SWIP'ed.
>
> Remove all references to a policy change for IPv4 and I'm fine with
> whatever IPv6 threshold ends up being. I think the current IPv6
> threshold is fine. I also don't really care what the IPv6 threshold is,
> so I'll leave the in depth discussion to everyone who does care. I'll
> follow whatever the NRPM ends up saying the threshold is for IPv6.
>
> But I oppose any changes to the IPv4 SWIP threshold.
>
> ~Seth
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170601/8f09e6bc/attachment.htm>