[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Owen DeLong]

The current proposal language says:

	/47 or shorter are SWIP’d in all cases.
	/48 or longer are SWIP’d if they are independently announced.

Owen

> On Jul 24, 2017, at 11:53 , Paul McNary <pmcnary at cameron.net> wrote:
> 
> What does the new language say?
> I then am totally confused as I am with the rest of the NPRM!
> 
> So many contradictions using Missouri English.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> On 7/24/2017 1:22 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> That’s not what the new language actually says.
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
>>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 13:26 , Paul McNary <pmcnary at cameron.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes
>>> 
>>> /48 is the SWIP boundary. /48 is SWIP'ed.
>>> /49 is not.
>>> 
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/20/2017 3:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>>> My recommendation was “shorter than /48” which would essentially mean the same thing.
>>>> 
>>>> Owen
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 15:46 , hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The language of "b)" actually makes more sense with a /47:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /47 or more addresses, or subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The major difference is that this language eliminates the SWIP requirement for /48 blocks that are not announced, but all larger blocks require SWIP, and blocks smaller than /48 are also exempt and of course also non-routeable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is best for those that think SWIP should be limited to only blocks that are individually announced.  I could go either way on this issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Albert Erdmann
>>>>> Network Administrator
>>>>> Paradise On Line Inc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Leif Sawyer wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody.   There's certainly a lot to think about here.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is located here:
>>>>>> https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And, to help clarify some confusion, per  6.5.5.3.1  (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
>>>>>> residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks"   may use censored data,  i.e.  "Private Customer/Residence"
>>>>>> in lieu of actual names and street addresses.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> With that said,  I have a couple of questions to ask, based on potential rewrites that are brewing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> First:    Assuming a preference for /56  (based on PPML feedback)  for the moment,   which is the more
>>>>>> preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> a)      Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> b)      Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Second:   Given your specific choice of A or B,  are you preferentially inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Third:  If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed approach?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Leif Sawyer
>>>>>> Advisory Council
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PPML
>>>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PPML
>>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PPML
>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.