[arin-ppml] 4.10 transition/deployment /10 Was: Re: Transition /10

[Martin Hannigan]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:08 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:




On 10/21/15 07:27 , Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> [ clip ]




>
> Conceptually, I've always liked and even preferred the RIPE and APNIC last
> /8 policy, but we couldn't agree on it in 2009, and our options are now
> limited.  If you have a specific suggestion based on the realities of today,
> --
>

I'd probably do it by rewriting 4.10 to

- retain the /10 and re designate it for run out (yes, 2 are allocated)
- restrict all assignments by it from being transferable except by 8.2
- restrict to corporate holdings in aggregate, not by org id <-- opex
heavy, discuss
- provide new "entrants" and existing resource holders with a single /24,
forever.
- no needs assessment, just ask and then don't come back

Best,

-M<
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20151022/c9119ccd/attachment.htm>