[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2014-12: Anti-hijack Policy
jcurran at arin.net
Thu May 22 06:54:08 EDT 2014
On May 21, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem this proposal intended to fix was with the staff, not the researchers.
"Going forward, ARIN will not issue routing authorization that covers any
address space issued to others without community-developed policy that
specifically directs us to do so. "
"NRPM 11 was designed for parties requesting allocations from ARIN for
research purposes; not ARIN checking the quality/integrity of new block
received from IANA. Given the recent occurance, I believe it is prudent
for ARIN to utilize NRPM 11 going forward for purposes of this quality
checking, as it makes visible the organization doing the testing/making
use of the space, including duration of the activity and research nature,
as well as reaffirming the expected uniqueness requirement."
> This proposal is a no op. Who was held accountable? Who will be held accountable if it happens again?
I am accountable to the community and its elected Board for compliance.
> I suggest the intent of the policy is good enough.
Clarity in number resource policy is always helpful in alignment with community
expectation and compliance to same.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML