[arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculating utilization

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Fri May 2 21:38:53 EDT 2014


On Friday, May 2, 2014, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:

> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Martin  Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Jeffrey,
> >
> > Let's be clear without political statements. I suggest we stamp all new
> v4 proposals "post exhaustion implementation" from here. Aside from the MAU
> reduction, I can't imagine anything else worthy of the effort.
> >
> > Agree or not?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > -M<
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On May 2, 2014, at 21:25, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes it is. Are you expecting such a change to happen before or after?
> The
> >>> recent fury of v4 policy seems geared towards sooner. I think a
> moratorium
> >>> is in order except for transfer related policy at this juncture.
> >>>
>
>
[clip]


>
>
> Please forgive me if I am just confused or ignorant, but I agree we
> are now exhausted and whether a proposal is stamped post-exhaustion or
> otherwise, its implementation would have an immediate effect.
>
> What am I missing?
>
>

So we agree then?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140502/fef0c1a6/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list