[arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculating utilization

Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net
Fri May 2 21:42:14 EDT 2014


It would seem so.

Jeff
On May 3, 2014 10:38 AM, "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Friday, May 2, 2014, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Martin  Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Jeffrey,
>> >
>> > Let's be clear without political statements. I suggest we stamp all new
>> v4 proposals "post exhaustion implementation" from here. Aside from the MAU
>> reduction, I can't imagine anything else worthy of the effort.
>> >
>> > Agree or not?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > -M<
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On May 2, 2014, at 21:25, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes it is. Are you expecting such a change to happen before or after?
>> The
>> >>> recent fury of v4 policy seems geared towards sooner. I think a
>> moratorium
>> >>> is in order except for transfer related policy at this juncture.
>> >>>
>>
>>
> [clip]
>
>
>>
>>
>> Please forgive me if I am just confused or ignorant, but I agree we
>> are now exhausted and whether a proposal is stamped post-exhaustion or
>> otherwise, its implementation would have an immediate effect.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>>
>
> So we agree then?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140503/d89182d6/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list