[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-17: Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate - revised

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Mon Jul 14 15:34:28 EDT 2014


On 7/14/2014 12:21 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2014 7:02 PM, "David Huberman" 
> <David.Huberman at microsoft.com <mailto:David.Huberman at microsoft.com>> 
> wrote:
> >
> > So I don't get something:
> >
> > If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of many XL 
> networks, almost all of whom would be immediately eligible for more 
> space even though they weren't eligible previously?
> >
> > I feel like in missing something.
>
> No, I think you have it.  The issue this proposal tries to fix for 
> some smaller networks has the (I presume) unintended side effect of 
> letting $megaisp$ acquire additional numbers immediately.  Perhaps 
> some contorted language could "fix" that without other side effects, 
> but the edges get complicated.
>
>

Deck chairs, Titanic.

Matthew Kaufman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140714/bc089bdb/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list