<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/14/2014 12:21 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMfXtQwxSQNZ0PpLhZpe8YYPTEjbz3+bd_VLya5VXRnnZDvKUA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Jul 14, 2014 7:02 PM, "David Huberman" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:David.Huberman@microsoft.com">David.Huberman@microsoft.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> So I don't get something:<br>
><br>
> If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of
many XL networks, almost all of whom would be immediately
eligible for more space even though they weren't eligible
previously?<br>
><br>
> I feel like in missing something.</p>
<p dir="ltr">No, I think you have it. The issue this proposal
tries to fix for some smaller networks has the (I presume)
unintended side effect of letting $megaisp$ acquire additional
numbers immediately. Perhaps some contorted language could
"fix" that without other side effects, but the edges get
complicated.</p>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Deck chairs, Titanic.<br>
<br>
Matthew Kaufman<br>
</body>
</html>