<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/14/2014 12:21 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAMfXtQwxSQNZ0PpLhZpe8YYPTEjbz3+bd_VLya5VXRnnZDvKUA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <p dir="ltr"><br>
        On Jul 14, 2014 7:02 PM, "David Huberman" <<a
          moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="mailto:David.Huberman@microsoft.com">David.Huberman@microsoft.com</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        ><br>
        > So I don't get something:<br>
        ><br>
        > If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of
        many XL networks, almost all of whom would be immediately
        eligible for more space even though they weren't eligible
        previously?<br>
        ><br>
        > I feel like in missing something.</p>
      <p dir="ltr">No, I think you have it.  The issue this proposal
        tries to fix for some smaller networks has the (I presume)
        unintended side effect of letting $megaisp$ acquire additional
        numbers immediately.  Perhaps some contorted language could
        "fix" that without other side effects, but the edges get
        complicated.</p>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Deck chairs, Titanic.<br>
    <br>
    Matthew Kaufman<br>
  </body>
</html>