[arin-ppml] Access to list of Number Resources with no valid POCs (was: Re: POC Validation ...)

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 06:46:49 EDT 2014


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> The policy proposal in the archive initially stated that it should be
>> brought to the attention of the community and didn't imply roadblocks.
>> I forget how the whois requirement was inserted and I don't really
>> care since the issue is policy, but if I recall correctly that whois
>> document wasn't a legal agreement "back then". Transparency != 6 pages
>> of legalese.
>>
>> Would have been nice to for the system to generate a warning to an
>> associated admin POC that ARIN was going to cripple a networks ability
>> to maintain its resource legitimately.
>>
>> IMHO, ARIN is over stepping its boundaries.
>>
>
> I disagree; I think this is well within the
> purview of ARIN's mandate to restrict
> access to records for non-compliant
> networks.
>
>
>
We can disagree. If ARIN made reasonable efforts to keep the registry
accurate and make the record keeping reasonable as well, no arguments. But
that is not the case. I wonder if the application of such a response is
consistent as well.


Best,

-M<
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140820/50b84d2d/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list