[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-6: Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors - Revised

[Martin Hannigan]

Or allowing competition.

Best,

Marty


On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Lee Dilkie wrote:

>  Which leads me to think the era of the regional RIR is over. Time to move
> back to a single registry.
>
> -lee
>
>
> On 10/8/2013 2:40 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote:
>
>  The virtual train has left the station.  80% of the servers we are doing
> now are Virtual and most need Internet IP addresses.  Almost all of the
> Internet IP addresses I’m assigning today are being assigned to virtual
> servers.  Treating them somehow like they are different than say a router
> in that they need one or more IP addresses makes no sense.  An Internet IP
> address - is an Internet IP address - is an Internet IP address - no matter
> what it is assigned to.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> I don’t like adding needless restrictions.  -1****
>
> ** **
>
> *Steven Ryerse*
>
> *President*
>
> *100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338*
>
> *770.656.1460 - Cell*
>
> *770.399.9099- Office*
>
> ** **
>
> [image: Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse
> Networks, Inc.****
>
>         Conquering Complex Networks℠****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Scott Leibrand [mailto:scottleibrand at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:45 PM
> *To:* Steven Ryerse
> *Cc:* John Curran; Frank Bulk; <arin-ppml at arin.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-6: Allocation of IPv4
> and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors - Revised****
>
> ** **
>
> Steven,****
>
> ** **
>
> Were you following the discussion at the NANOG PPC?  (It's being webcast.)
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> The challenge with what you're describing seems to be that many
> organizations who provide virtual servers, tunnels, or other similar
> services over virtual infrastructure have to justify their addresses based
> on how many customers they have (as their physical infrastructure isn't
> necessarily growing).****
>
> ** **
>
> There will also be another round of discussion of this policy at the ARIN
> Public Policy meeting later this week.****
>
> ** **
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20131008/6aa6d10f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20131008/6aa6d10f/attachment.jpe>