<div><br></div>Or allowing competition. <span></span><div><br></div><div>Best, </div><div><br></div><div>Marty</div><div><br><br>On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Lee Dilkie wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFCC" text="#000000">
Which leads me to think the era of the regional RIR is over. Time to
move back to a single registry.<br>
<br>
-lee<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 10/8/2013 2:40 PM, Steven Ryerse
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The
virtual train has left the station. 80% of the servers we
are doing now are Virtual and most need Internet IP
addresses. Almost all of the Internet IP addresses I’m
assigning today are being assigned to virtual servers.
Treating them somehow like they are different than say a
router in that they need one or more IP addresses makes no
sense. An Internet IP address - is an Internet IP address -
is an Internet IP address - no matter what it is assigned
to. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I
don’t like adding needless restrictions. -1<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p><i><span>Steven
Ryerse<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p><i><span>President<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p><i><span>100 Ashford
Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p><i><span>770.656.1460
- Cell<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p><i><span>770.399.9099-
Office<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><img src="cid:part1.01090200.01010206@dilkie.com" alt="Description: Description: Eclipse Networks
Logo_small.png" height="37" width="56"></span><span>℠</span><span>
</span><span>Eclipse
Networks, Inc.</span><span><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="text-indent:.5in"><sup><span>
Conquering Complex Networks</span></sup><sup><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">℠</span></sup><sup><span><u></u><u></u></span></sup></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
Scott Leibrand [<a>mailto:scottleibrand@gmail.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:45 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Steven Ryerse<br>
<b>Cc:</b> John Curran; Frank Bulk;
<a><arin-ppml@arin.net></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-6:
Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region
Requestors - Revised<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p>Steven,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Were you following the discussion at
the NANOG PPC? (It's being webcast.)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>The challenge with what you're
describing seems to be that many organizations who provide
virtual servers, tunnels, or other similar services over
virtual infrastructure have to justify their addresses
based on how many customers they have (as their physical
infrastructure isn't necessarily growing).<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>There will also be another round of
discussion of this policy at the ARIN Public Policy
meeting later this week.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>