[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[John Santos]

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, William Herrin wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> > g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
> > expand the allocation to /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or
> > additional justification.
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> This could be misread to mean "/32 or /36 respectively" instead of
> "either /32 or /36 as the registrant chooses."
> 
> 
> > e. All returned block(s) must not be in use by the organization or its
> > customers.
> 
> This verbiage is a little clumsy. I'm not sure how to word it better.
> 
> -Bill

How about:

e. No returned block may be in use by the organization or its customers.


-- 
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539