[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[William Herrin]

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to
> expand the allocation to /32 or /36 at any time without renumbering or
> additional justification.

Hi David,

This could be misread to mean "/32 or /36 respectively" instead of
"either /32 or /36 as the registrant chooses."


> e. All returned block(s) must not be in use by the organization or its
> customers.

This verbiage is a little clumsy. I'm not sure how to word it better.

-Bill




-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004