[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

[John Curran]

On May 4, 2012, at 8:12 AM, William Herrin wrote:

> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> Staff review is underway now.  At first glance, it appears that the proposal
>> is not a policy change for management of number resources but a suggestion
>> for a specific portion of the request verification process.
> 
> Something's wrong here John. If we can't write a policy that says,
> "Err on the side of avoiding PII" and expect it to actually do
> something then the policy process is gravely broken.

Bill - 

   In lieu of asking for customer reassignments data to support claimed
   utilization of an address block, what information do you propose that 
   ARIN accept? 

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN