[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

[William Herrin]

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> Staff review is underway now.  At first glance, it appears that the proposal
> is not a policy change for management of number resources but a suggestion
> for a specific portion of the request verification process.

Something's wrong here John. If we can't write a policy that says,
"Err on the side of avoiding PII" and expect it to actually do
something then the policy process is gravely broken.

Seriously, if a hospital claims that 9/10ths of its use is DHCP pools
for patient use is ARIN going to ask for a list of patients w/
addresses and phone numbers which used a particular pool? Of course
not, in the U.S. that would be illegal. You'll find another way. So
how do we write a policy which says, "Just use the other way all the
time."

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004