[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 15:58:14 EST 2012


On Friday, February 17, 2012, Daved Daly wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:04 PM, <jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>>  Is it in the best interest of the community to maintain needs-based
>> justification policy that may discourage legitimate participation
>> through Specified Transfers in an attempt to corral the fringe element
>> that would seek to speculate, horde and profit from IPv4 transfers?
>>
>
> I don't want to speak for them, but It seems like the obvious answer much
> of the community is responding with is a clear, "yes".
>


according to MM, we are just a *small number of anti-market ideologues*.

In any case, there are better reasons to maintain needs requirements
besides *corralling the fringe element*, but that alone is reason enough
IMO.

Rgds,

McTim


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120217/8ebe5471/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list