[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification

[John Springer]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, McTim wrote:
> On Friday, February 17, 2012, Daved Daly wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:04 PM, <jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jeffmehlenbacher at ipv4marketgroup.com');>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Is it in the best interest of the community to maintain needs-based
>>> justification policy that may discourage legitimate participation
>>> through Specified Transfers in an attempt to corral the fringe element
>>> that would seek to speculate, horde and profit from IPv4 transfers?
>>>
>>
>> I don't want to speak for them, but It seems like the obvious answer much
>> of the community is responding with is a clear, "yes".
>>
>
>
> according to MM, we are just a *small number of anti-market ideologues*.
>
> In any case, there are better reasons to maintain needs requirements
> besides *corralling the fringe element*, but that alone is reason enough
> IMO.
>
> Rgds,
>
> McTim
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>

+1

John "Head in the Sand" Springer