[arin-ppml] Fee structures for ARIN
jbates at brightok.net
Fri Oct 28 11:17:48 EDT 2011
On 10/28/2011 9:56 AM, John Curran wrote:
> Presumably, legacy block holders currently receiving services without
> charge would begin paying these fees upon signing the LRSA? I imagine
> a few /8 and /16 address holders might suggest that the services they
> require do not cause ARIN expenses even close to the suggested fees?
> This becomes even more important if you omit IPv4 from the equation.
Scope the equation. If legacy's sign an LRSA but still don't pay current
v4 tier fees, then don't include any of their v4 in the equation. Or
apply a weight to their holdings. As long as it is applied on both
sides, it will still average out right.
Instead of completely dropping v6 from the equation, you could exclude
v4 and only count v6, if # of /48 > # of /24 * modifier, otherwise only
count v4. The modifier to to protect small ISP's who get /32 of IPv6.
It requires that you maintain for all registrants if you're putting
their v4 or their v6 into the equation.
More information about the ARIN-PPML