[arin-ppml] question about NRPM 'efficient utilization' criteria
owen at delong.com
Sat Oct 15 12:23:55 EDT 2011
I don't think that's correct. I think the reference to the table governs and the table should be restored (with appropriate referential updates) to a more appropriate location.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 14, 2011, at 21:17, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
> <gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The 126.96.36.199.5 table was deleted by 2010-14 (you can see the original
>> format in the previous versions of the NRPM). Clearly the references
>> should have been updated/removed.
> Oops... someone free()'d the page the table was on, but left a dangling
> pointer reference in the NRPM.
> I would call that a bug. :)
>> Previous version of the NRPM with the table:
> If the table is gone... the conclusion I would have is that the
> table is no longer
> allowed under the policy, so it doesn't matter what the old version said,
> if it's no longer an allowed method.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML