[arin-ppml] IPv4 Transfer Policy Change to Keep Whois Accurate

[Mike Burns]

Blake,

Is having an emergency supplier of IP addresses a negative for the community?
Is having a temporary supplier of IP addresses a negative for the community?
Is having a supplier for long-range plans a negative for the community?

Is this what stewarship has become, having a few elites making these kinds of decisions about which businesses the community finds positive or negative?
What's wrong with letting the bad ones go broke and the good ones succeed as measures of their positive or negative attributes?

Regards,
Mike


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Blake Dunlap 
  To: Mike Burns 
  Cc: Tom Vest ; arin-ppml at arin.net 
  Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:17 PM
  Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv4 Transfer Policy Change to Keep Whois Accurate


  On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 18:10, Mike Burns <mike at nationwideinc.com> wrote:

    What difference does it make if space is sitting in a broker's inventory or the inventory of ARIN's STLS? What about the many other examples I gave where the current needs requirement would not be met? Like temporary use, emergency suppliers, lessors, or those with planning horizons longer than ARIIN dictat?


  All of these have been previously responded to, just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean it hasn't already been answered.

  As a recap, every example you have listed above is a negative for the community for the benefit of one actor, or completely unrelated to what you are trying to push in this proposal.

  -Blake
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110519/46cae24d/attachment.htm>