[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold

Rudolph Daniel rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Fri May 13 13:56:01 EDT 2011


I opposed....this proposal makes very little sense to me.
RD


> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:52 AM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:49 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold
> >>
> >> Proposal Originator: Matthew Kaufman
> >>
> >> Proposal Version: 1
> >>
> >> Date: 13 May 2011
> >>
> >> Proposal type: new
> >>
> >> Policy term: permanent
> >>
> >> Policy statement:
> >>
> >> Add a new section to the NRPM:
> >> "All resources reclaimed by ARIN shall not be returned to the free pool
> >> or otherwise reassigned to any entity than the original registrant for a
> >> period of 36 months."
> >
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:50:28 -0400
> From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> To: McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com>
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikxxDM4HspUipFB_DhBaRvFznTusA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:52 AM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:49 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold
> >>
> >> Proposal Originator: Matthew Kaufman
> >>
> >> Proposal Version: 1
> >>
> >> Date: 13 May 2011
> >>
> >> Proposal type: new
> >>
> >> Policy term: permanent
> >>
> >> Policy statement:
> >>
> >> Add a new section to the NRPM:
> >> "All resources reclaimed by ARIN shall not be returned to the free pool
> >> or otherwise reassigned to any entity than the original registrant for a
> >> period of 36 months."
> >
> > I am opposed to this. ?36 months is far too long IMO for a "quarantine"
>
>
> Agreed, we just had a proposal with significant support to return
> address reclaimed to the free pool with a high expectation of
> "faster", not slower. I don't see why this would be any different
> hence I expect a lack of community support. In fact, I think that the
> author should consider withdrawing this to save us all some time.
>
> We need to leave this as an administrative decision influenced by the
> community vs. a rule. This is an example of not knowing what you might
> not  know.
>
> Best,
>
> -M<
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML mailing list
> ARIN-PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>
> End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 71, Issue 143
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110513/b4d3a43a/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list