<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>I opposed....this proposal makes very little sense to me.</div><div>RD</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:52 AM, McTim <<a href="mailto:dogwallah@gmail.com">dogwallah@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:49 PM, ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold<br>
>><br>
>> Proposal Originator: Matthew Kaufman<br>
>><br>
>> Proposal Version: 1<br>
>><br>
>> Date: 13 May 2011<br>
>><br>
>> Proposal type: new<br>
>><br>
>> Policy term: permanent<br>
>><br>
>> Policy statement:<br>
>><br>
>> Add a new section to the NRPM:<br>
>> "All resources reclaimed by ARIN shall not be returned to the free pool<br>
>> or otherwise reassigned to any entity than the original registrant for a<br>
>> period of 36 months."<br>
><br><br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:50:28 -0400<br>
From: Martin Hannigan <<a href="mailto:hannigan@gmail.com">hannigan@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: McTim <<a href="mailto:dogwallah@gmail.com">dogwallah@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net">arin-ppml@arin.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:BANLkTikxxDM4HspUipFB_DhBaRvFznTusA@mail.gmail.com">BANLkTikxxDM4HspUipFB_DhBaRvFznTusA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:52 AM, McTim <<a href="mailto:dogwallah@gmail.com">dogwallah@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:49 PM, ARIN <<a href="mailto:info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold<br>
>><br>
>> Proposal Originator: Matthew Kaufman<br>
>><br>
>> Proposal Version: 1<br>
>><br>
>> Date: 13 May 2011<br>
>><br>
>> Proposal type: new<br>
>><br>
>> Policy term: permanent<br>
>><br>
>> Policy statement:<br>
>><br>
>> Add a new section to the NRPM:<br>
>> "All resources reclaimed by ARIN shall not be returned to the free pool<br>
>> or otherwise reassigned to any entity than the original registrant for a<br>
>> period of 36 months."<br>
><br>
> I am opposed to this. ?36 months is far too long IMO for a "quarantine"<br>
<br>
<br>
Agreed, we just had a proposal with significant support to return<br>
address reclaimed to the free pool with a high expectation of<br>
"faster", not slower. I don't see why this would be any different<br>
hence I expect a lack of community support. In fact, I think that the<br>
author should consider withdrawing this to save us all some time.<br>
<br>
We need to leave this as an administrative decision influenced by the<br>
community vs. a rule. This is an example of not knowing what you might<br>
not know.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
-M<<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ARIN-PPML mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml" target="_blank">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>
<br>
End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 71, Issue 143<br>
******************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br><br>