[arin-ppml] Serious question for the list.

[Alexander, Daniel]

Tenure on the list is irrelevant. It is the value of the comments that
carry weight. While I don't know how long he has subscribed to the list, I
think Leif Sawyer is a good example. I haven't seen many posts from him,
but he made a very relevant point in the discussion regarding prop-147. I
am confident few people thought about how the time requirements in policy
impacted his business, given a very limited construction season in Alaska.

-Dan

On 5/5/11 2:44 PM, "Mike Burns" <mike at nationwideinc.com> wrote:

>> The AC does pay close attention to PPML and to our perceived will
>> of the community. Yes, our perceived will of the community is a
>> somewhat nebulous concept, but, I think that is unavoidable in
>> a consensus-based bottom-up process. However, if the community
>> expresses strong support for a direction contrary to the current
>> policy, that support would definitely be considered by the AC.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>
>Would the AC give more weight to expressions of support from long term
>list 
>members than from newcomers?
>
>Regards,
>Mike 
>
>_______________________________________________
>PPML
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.