[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses
hannigan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 28 09:33:50 EST 2011
Thanks, Kevin. And thanks to both of you for the feedback. I was
looking at ARIN by-laws with respect to members and all of the
comments don't clearly match up. I think generalizing to ARIN region
is probably better.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Kevin Blumberg <kevinb at thewire.ca> wrote:
> I support the proposal. I understand William's concern. Would a change to
> the text to read “will be made available for allocation and assignment
> within the ARIN
> Region.“ work?
> Kevin Blumberg
> The Wire Inc.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net>
> To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net <arin-ppml at arin.net>
> Sent: Thu Jan 27 17:36:30 2011
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:06 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> Two obvious problems:
>>> 1. ARIN members aren't the only registrants.
> Hi Marty,
> Although end-user registrants, legacy-only registrants and registrants
> holding only non-IP resources may become ARIN members by paying an
> additional $500/year, they rarely do. With a few exceptions, only ISPs
> are ARIN members.
> The basic difference between a member and a non-member is that members
> can vote in the elections while everybody else merely receives
> Bill Herrin
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML