[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks - revised

[Keith W. Hare]

Jeffrey,

>From your point of view then, the question is does Prop-133 do anything to support IPv4 longer in order to give enough vendors enough time to support IPv6?

>From my point of view, Prop-133 would only serve to confuse the IPv4 space and would not extend IPv4 viability at all. 

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Lyon
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:58 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-133: No Volunteer Services on Behalf of Unaffiliated Address Blocks - revised

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Keep in mind that many of us still live on that volcano.
>
> Sure... It's time to move. We cannot change the direction of the lava flow.
> It will destroy your house.
>
> If you don't move, the results are your responsibility.
>
> Owen
>
>

We'd be happy to, as soon as we gain universal vendor support. As i've
mentioned in NANOG, we're not going to flame specific vendors but more
often than not there are serious issues with native IPv6 adoption (at
least at this point).

-- 

Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.