[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses
packetgrrl at gmail.com
Mon Feb 14 14:18:53 EST 2011
I'd like to understand the argument as to why we should only include legacy
space and not non-legacy space? Can someone explain it to me?
I really thought this policy was to fill the gap in the IANA policy that
only allows /8s to go from IANA to the RIRs and to be specific about what
ARIN was going to do with any returned address space post IANA depletion.
As shepherd for this proposal I am really trying to understand why it is
specifically limited to legacy space?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
> > I agree. I see no reason to distinguish in this case. IMHO, this
> > policy should apply to ALL addresses returned to ARIN.
> I disagree. If some on the AC want to modify this when the AC receives
> it, that's up to them. I've made the edits that will resolve the
> issues that I've identified in the most clear and concise way
> possible. So far, I've heard only straw-men as to why to include any
> other text. If I read something that is significant and that doesn't
> seek to lop on complexity and unnecessary actions, I'll be happy to
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML