[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Feb 14 15:58:28 EST 2011

On Feb 14, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
>> I agree. I see no reason to distinguish in this case. IMHO, this
>> policy should apply to ALL addresses returned to ARIN.
> I disagree. If some on the AC want to modify this when the AC receives
> it, that's up to them. I've made the edits that will resolve the
> issues that I've identified in the most clear and concise way
> possible. So far, I've heard only straw-men as to why to include any
> other text. If I read something that is significant and that doesn't
> seek to lop on complexity and unnecessary actions, I'll be happy to
> reconsider.
I don't think we are suggesting that you add any other text, so, your
statement about straw-men is inapplicable.

We are suggesting that you remove a single word. I will make
the motion for the AC to make the edit on Thursday if I have
to, but, usually we try to work with the author first.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list