[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - Last Call

[cja@daydream.com]

Benson,

What I do know is that if this passes in this region ARIN will have to
discuss it with the IESG because of RFC 2860 and the MOU that currently
exists.

I am looking around to see if I can find the discussion of this internet
draft.  I do see that it expired and was removed.

-----CJ

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Benson Schliesser
<bensons at queuefull.net>wrote:

> Hi, Cathy.
>
> On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, cja at daydream.com wrote:
>
> > I too oppose this proposal.  Let's be really clear here.  The more
> appropriate venue is/was the IETF and the IETF turned it down.  It was also
> brought up in the APNIC region and that region also turned it down.
>
> My understanding is that the IETF didn't think they were the appropriate
> venue, and that this was a policy question more appropriate for the RIR
> community.  But, I confess: I didn't participate closely in that discussion.
>  Is there something that we can reference (e.g. an archive or document) to
> understand this decision?
>
> Cheers,
> -Benson
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110420/a21e392c/attachment.htm>