[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2010-4: Rework of IPv6 allocation criteria - Last Call

[Wettling, Fred]

Thanks for the clarification.  I support the change as written. 

Fred 

  

From: "David Farmer" <farmer@ umn . edu > 
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:41:02 PM 

Wettling, Fred wrote: 
> The clean-up of policy section 6 in Draft Policy 2010-4 looks OK. 
> Please explain why the minimum allocations over five years has been reduced from 200 to 50. 

This was a compromise between not requiring any specific number of customers (0 or 1, depending on your view), which didn't gain consensus in Dearborn , and the current 200. 

Personally, I don't believe there is any magic in the number be it 50 or 200, many felt that 200 was to high of a barrier.  I support lowering it, I'd be OK, with no specific number of customers. However, there seems to be a consensus that there should be some number.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100513/0cda2512/attachment.htm>