<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000066'><P>Thanks for the clarification. I support the change as written.</P>
<P>Fred</P>
<P> </P>
<P><B>From: </B>"David Farmer" <farmer@<SPAN id=DWT113 class=ZM-SPELLCHECK-MISSPELLED word="umn">umn</SPAN>.<SPAN id=DWT114 class=ZM-SPELLCHECK-MISSPELLED word="edu">edu</SPAN>><BR><B>Sent: </B>Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:41:02 PM<BR><BR>Wettling, Fred wrote:<BR>> The clean-up of policy section 6 in Draft Policy 2010-4 looks OK. <BR>> Please explain why the minimum allocations over five years has been reduced from 200 to 50.<BR><BR>This was a compromise between not requiring any specific number of customers (0 or 1, depending on your view), which didn't gain consensus in <SPAN id=DWT115 class=ZM-SPELLCHECK-MISSPELLED word="Dearborn">Dearborn</SPAN>, and the current 200.<BR><BR>Personally, I don't believe there is any magic in the number be it 50 or 200, many felt that 200 was to high of a barrier. I support lowering it, I'd be OK, with no specific number of customers. However, there seems to be a consensus that there should be some number.</P></div></body></ht
ml>