[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2010-4: Rework of IPv6 allocation criteria - Last Call

[David Farmer]

Wettling, Fred wrote:
> The clean-up of policy section 6 in Draft Policy 2010-4 looks OK. 
> 
> I agree with deleting section 6.4.3 since is redundant. 
> 
> Please explain why the minimum allocations over five years has been reduced from 200 to 50.

This was a compromise between not requiring any specific number of 
customers (0 or 1, depending on your view), which didn't gain consensus 
in Dearborn, and the current 200.

Personally, I don't believe there is any magic in the number be it 50 or 
200, many felt that 200 was to high of a barrier.  I support lowering 
it, I'd be OK, with no specific number of customers. However, there 
seems to be a consensus that there should be some number.

> Will 50 still be in alignment with the required HD ratio in section 6.5.2.2?

The HD Ratio is about justification of an additional allocation, so this 
change really shouldn't have much affect on that section, at least as I 
see it.

> Thanks,
> Fred Wettling 
>   
>   
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.


-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota	
2218 University Ave SE	    Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================