[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
mpetach at netflight.com
Thu Dec 30 14:26:45 EST 2010
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> Which is why perhaps prop 125 should be modified to allow transfers sans
> IPv6. That might even kickstart the transfer market.
That would seem to be an interesting modification to the proposal--adjust the
language so that *new* allocations from ARIN should be matched by a
corresponding IPv6 deployment, but that v4 transfers are not likewise
Given that transfers are likely to cost real $$s, that provides the more gentle
encouragement for companies; if you want it for cheap from ARIN, pony up
with some v6; otherwise, pay market rates for recycled space.
Depending on the wording, I might be able to support a modified proposal
along those lines.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matthew at matthew.at]
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:03 PM
> To: frnkblk at iname.com
> Cc: 'Bret Palsson'; arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
> Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
> On 12/30/2010 10:46 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> It's possible that if prop 125 passed that the prices for transferred IPv4
>> space would go up earlier than if we waited for ARIN's free pool to
>> evaporate. Those with IPv4 space to sell would price in the fact that
>> IPv4-only shops can't get more IPv4 space from ARIN's free pool.
> The proposal as-is would also prevent transfers to entities that hadn't
> deployed IPv6. So there'd be *no* transfer market during this time...
> except a grey/black one.
> Matthew Kaufman
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML